Every kid is an oddball kid.
As the United States progresses
toward the middle of the twenty-first century, we are finding ourselves more
and more immersed in global-scale realities. Many of my memoiric tales tell of growing up in a small town
that no longer exists. The local department
store no longer anchors downtown. The
corner grocer is now a 7-ll with no fresh meats or produce but lots of big,
fizzy drinks. The independent
hardware store is a dying breed. We shop Trader Joe’s for that local feel, but
purchase foodstuffs from as far away as one can be and still be on the
planet. A trip to the men’s
department at Penney’s finds us buying Levi’s manufactured in Mexico. I did this yesterday. The computer I type this on was
manufactured in China. Likewise,
the market for the area’s almonds or rice or navel oranges is no longer limited
to the roadside stand or the Hershey factory down in Oakdale. It is global.
There is good and bad associated with this evolution. On the plus side, consumers can
purchase product at favorable prices.
On the negative side, locally based industries face competition from
across the globe. On the plus
side, we are afforded more and more selection of – on the negative side –
things we don’t really need. No
longer is there a US economy. The
economy is worldwide. We are all
in this together.
What does this have to do with schools? Education leaders are discovering that
the market for their product – the 18-year-old high school graduate – is no
longer limited to the community.
The market is global. If a
high school student from India is more prepared to maintain the machine that
solders together solid-state componentry or uni-body automobiles than the
graduate from Happy Valley High, guess who’s likely to get the job? Or, worse, guess where the job is going
to go?
Schools of late have been charged with ramping up curricular
offerings to produce world-class graduates able to complete on a
skills-available basis with any other kid of his or her age anywhere. Thus, in California, students are
pushed into higher levels of mathematical application, technical comprehension,
and scientific reasoning. Coupled
with these new-basic skills are the ability to think critically, problem
solve and get along with others.
These are the tools with which students must be equipped in order to win
bread in 2050.
Parents cannot protect their children from the rigors that
will be demanded of them – rigors the parents, as kids, were never asked to
achieve. Teachers, for that matter
cannot rely upon that which has always worked, because, in essence, the goal
posts have just been moved, and they aren’t going to stand still. Therefore, parents and teachers may
need to adopt a credo of the life-long learner if only to keep one step ahead
of their kids.
How does the global view manifest itself in
schools? In the
education industry’s most recent past – and I am a huge proponent of the public
schools, one who served in a site-level or curriculum leadership position for
nearly 25 years – efforts have been made to feed students more content and test
it out the other end. (Yes, I know what that sounds like.) Higher
levels of mathematics instruction are being addressed at younger ages. Reading more complex works is occurring
at earlier grades. More time has
been devoted to these old basics as success is measured by objective,
easy-to-score tests – while those new basics (mathematical
application, technical comprehension, and scientific reasoning, the ability to
think critically, problem solve and get along with others) have gone
unaddressed. Also unaddressed have
been the arts: literary, visual, performing and vocational.
Teachers have had to demand compliance of students because
there is too much on the agenda to screw around with the oddball child who
learns differently or requires more attention. Besides, the No Child Left Behind Act mandated, yes mandated, that 100% of all students be
performing at or above grade level by 2014 – this includes the kid who arrives
from the Ukraine the week before annual testing began – or the school will be
labeled underperforming. Teachers,
administrators, and local realtors hoping to jack up the price of homes, don’t
want this. Meanwhile, parents grow
frustrated because the child comes home frustrated because the frustrated
teacher didn’t take time to meet the frustrated kid’s needs. The whole thing is, well, frustrating.
How should
the global view manifest itself in schools? With the advancement of nationally
based common core standards, we can expect some of the nit-picky factoid
regurgitation to go away. Still
for schools to move kids to higher levels of competency, they will need to
build curriculum not around facts and algorithms and technical comprehension,
but the application of facts and algorithms those things comprehended to solve
problems through critical thinking.
Checking for understanding (and parents can do this as well as teachers) will need to evolve asking such things as:
- How did you arrive at that solution?
- What other solutions did you evaluate?
- Can this solution be used to advance new knowledge or applied to solve another problem?
- How might his idea have helped (name an historic figure) in (name an historic circumstance)?
Public schools will deliver the goods in terms of creating
viable, competitive citizens when they depart from the teach and test cycle and
embrace instruction that demands application of knowledge in new and different
ways. And they won’t be able to
test this type of learning with fill-in-the-bubble assessments. Sure, critics will toss up the straw
man argument that Joe-High-School-Graduate didn’t even know that Lincoln was
president when the south seceded.
That’s because Joe had more important levels of learning to accomplish
and, besides, Joe probably knows how to look up the Lincoln answer on his Smart
Phone.
What options exist for today’s frustrated
parent? Having served
19 years as a site principal, I have heard from parents that the school is not
meeting the needs of the student.
I have also heard from teachers that they have 32 children who’s needs
they feel they must address. As
budgets tighten there is less resource available for anyone’s kid.
So, what about private
school? Choose carefully. Private schools are not required to
adhere to content or curriculum standards. Private schools may not necessarily employ teachers who hold
valid teaching credentials or certificates. This doesn’t mean the teacher can’t be successful, but just
as there are qualification standards for those who drive semi-trucks on the
highway, standards for those to whom we entrust our children’s education are
probably a good thing. Private
schools are under no obligation to serve students with learning disabilities or
who present behavioral issues. Many
students who return to public schools after years in private schools find they
are behind the curve when compared to their grade level peers.
What about Charter
Schools? Charter schools are
publicly funded. They may not have
to employ credentialed teachers. They
get to try different things. (So
do traditional public schools, but there are some statutory limits under which
traditional schools must operate, particularly when it comes to curriculum
adoptions.) Some charters are
sponsored by school districts. Foundations
or corporations sponsor others.
Charter schools may have a focus like basic skills, science and
engineering or the arts. Charter
schools may not deny admittance to students who apply but they may “be full”
and place the interested student on a waiting list or they may suggest that,
after review the student’s record that the student would be “more successful”
elsewhere. For some reason – hmmm – many charter schools serve fewer
students who are educationally
disadvantaged or come with an IEP.
Thus, some charter schools are able to mine for the cream of the crop
students in an area. Oddly, as
recently as 2009, assessment results for charter schools in California lagged slightly
behind those scores for their traditional counterparts.
How about Home
Schooling? Home schooling is a
viable option for some but it is not without restriction. School districts or county offices of
education are the gatekeepers for those wishing to educate their kids at
home. A credentialed teacher meets
with the provider-parent for a minimum of an hour per week to set out the curriculum
that must be covered. Kids are
assessed using traditional public school assessments annually. Scores for these home-schooled kids are
figured in with the scores of the student’s home district for some reason. The district or county may revoke the home
school privilege if the parent refuses to address the curriculum or the student
fails to make progress. There are many sound reasons for wanting to school off-spring at home, but some
parents choose home schooling simply if their child demonstrates difficulty with school-peer
relationships. This is shortsighted. The way to deal with a problem like,
say, a hangnail, is not to ignore
it. Parents of home-schooled children often form associations so that their "students" may interact with others. Good solution! Often, home-schooled kids
reenter the public arena behind their grade level associates, however, just as
often, home-schooled kids knock the socks off of their peer group. Some even enter the university one, two
or three years ahead of their contemporaries.
What about another
public school? Districts in
urban or suburban areas often times have more than one school serving the same
set of grades. A shift from one
school in the district to another (or a shift to a school in a nearby district)
will mean educating the student outside his or her neighborhood. If a child needs a fresh start, this is
a good option. If the child is
running away from a problem it is not.
A child moving to a public school outside his or her attendance area or
to a school in a neighboring district may be kept on a short leash in terms of
behavior. Some school
administrators will dismiss a “visiting” student who fails to perform (because
it impacts the school’s scores) or exhibits behavioral problems (because it
impacts the teacher/principal’s time) without due process.
My recommendation? The local public school is the best
option unless something completely unforeseen happens. Parents working with teachers can
generally move the child forward.
Ensuring that the child knows that the teacher and the parent are on the
same path often presents a mountain just high enough that the kid won’t want to
peek and see what’s on the other side.
Schools are under both political and economic pressure to
demand excellent performance from their students. And parents need to back ‘em up. If questions arise about how “excellence” is defined, those
questions should be asked privately, understood thoroughly and followed through
upon religiously. Beyond what the
schools can currently offer, outlets for extra-curricular activities in the arts
or athletics can give a kid a reason to go forth as well as a valuable means of
self-expression. Back in the day,
we could depend on the school to provide these. As we progress toward that mid-twenty-first century mark,
hopefully we, like the Chinese and many European countries, will embrace the
value of returning these elements to a full and well-rounded education. But that doesn’t help the current mom
or dad or the current student with the current “right now.”
Bottom line? Even with the sharpest or most mild
mannered child, it isn’t going to always be easy. Some children require more
malleating than others.
(Malleating is a word I just made up. It is based on the word malleable, and it may involve use of
a mallet.) But insulating children
from the consequences of non-performance, lack of compliance, or inability to
be a good friend, in the end will not serve the kid in adulthood. And, collectively, preparing the next
generation for success is the most important thing, we as a society, can do.
Finally, consider this: Public education is a little like service from
PG&E. The utility company gets
the power to the house, but it is our job to flip the switch and turn on the
light. No fair cursing the
darkness.
© 2013
Church of the Open Road Press